Democrats threw every witch hunt possible at President Trump.
But the effort to end his Presidency failed.
And one Democrat anti-Trump hoax imploded after this confession.
As Conservative Reboot reports:
Joe Biden and Attorney General Merrick Garland handpicked prosecutor Jack Smith to persecute Donald Trump in the January 6 and classified document hoaxes.
Smith indicted Trump on 41 counts and sought to throw Trump in jail until he died.
Trump decried these persecutions as witch hunts intended to interfere in the 2024 election by forcing him to campaign from the courthouse and then a jail cell.
The fake news media smeared Trump as a conspiracy theorist and claimed Smith walked on the side of angels.
But once, the facts proved President Trump was right.
Smith testified behind closed doors to the House Judiciary Committee.
The basis of the January 6 hoax was that President Trump incited an insurrection to overthrow the government and block Joe Biden from taking office.
Investigators asked Smith flat out if he gathered any evidence implicating Trump in planning or inciting the January 6 riot.
“So did you develop evidence that President Trump, you know, was responsible for the violence at the Capitol on January 6th?” a committee lawyer asked Smith.
Smith avoided providing a direct answer.
“So our view of the evidence was that he caused it and that he exploited it and that it was foreseeable to him,” Smith replied.
Judiciary Committee lawyers pressed Smith on this point, saying Smith was admitting he didn’t have evidence that Trump ordered his supporters to enter the Capitol.
“But you don’t have any evidence that he instructed people to crash the Capitol, do you?” the lawyer followed up.
Smith once again launched into a long-winded answer.
“As I said, our evidence is that he, in the weeks leading up to January 6th, created a level of distrust. He used that level of distrust to get people to believe fraudulent claims that weren’t true. He made false statements to State legislatures, to his supporters in all sorts of contexts, and was aware in the days leading up to January 6th that his supporters were angry when he invited them, and then he directed them to the Capitol,” Smith responded.
This question required a simple one-word answer.
And that was “yes” or “no.”
Jack Smith said a lot of words.
One of them wasn’t “yes.”
As the Washington Examiner’s Byron York wrote on X, a truthful answer by Smith would have been “no.”
“In the House deposition, Jack Smith was asked, ‘Did you develop evidence that President Trump was responsible for the violence at the Capitol on January 6th?’ Read this, and you’ll see the short answer should have been, ‘No,’” York posted.
Trump received vindication in the January 6 hoax.
And it came from none other than Jack Smith.