Democrat prosecutor Alvin Bragg took the unprecedented step of trying Donald Trump in an election year.
But Bragg is trying to distract Americans from one major development.
And a federal prosecutor revealed Alvin Bragg is guilty of this damning infraction.
Former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy dissected Bragg’s case against Trump.
The basic gist of Bragg’s convoluted legal theory is that Donald Trump stole the 2016 election by arranging for Michael Cohen to pay Stormy Daniels $130,000 as part of a non-disclosure agreement in October of that year to keep her from going public with the affair.
Trump then marked the reimbursement to Cohen as for legal services when Bragg claims this was done to cover up an illegal campaign contribution.
Bragg baselessly asserted if the American people knew about the affair allegations Clinton would have won the election.
McCarthy pointed out that Bragg – by relitigating the 2016 election using this cockamamie theory – is now an “election denier,” a label Democrats consider on par with being a Nazi when talking about Republicans.
“It is an elected progressive Democratic district attorney’s version of ‘stop the steal’ — the fraud that Democrats claim leaves ‘our democracy’ hanging by a thread. Don’t take my word for it. Just read the Statement of Facts, so-called, that Bragg published in conjunction with the indictment,” McCarthy wrote in a column published by National Review.
McCarthy dissected the numerous flaws in this, namely that the Federal Election Commission and the Department of Justice didn’t deem the payment to Daniels a campaign expenditure by virtue of the fact that they didn’t press charges against Trump or fine him in this matter.
The other problem – as McCarthy explained – is that Trump didn’t deprive the American people of knowledge about the nature of the payment to Daniels because the campaign finance report where Trump’s team would have documented it wasn’t made public until January 2017.
“This is why Bragg is left to explain the anomaly that, in connection with a claim that Trump stole the 2016 election, the ‘offenses’ he charges did not occur until 2017. Obviously, you can’t steal something in 2016 by actions you don’t take until the next year. If this absurd case had been charged against anyone in America other than Trump, that is a refrain you’d have heard from the media about a zillion times by now,” McCarthy added.
McCarthy highlighted the partisan hypocrisy at work by detailing how the Federal Election Commission fined Hillary Clinton’s campaign for concealing the fact that it hired Fusion GPS to commission the Christopher Steele hoax Russia collusion dossier by laundering the money through law firm Perkins Coie and then falsely reporting the expenditure as for legal services.
“And if we’re going to talk 2016 election, Trump’s rival, Hillary Clinton, actually was found by the FEC to have violated federal campaign law. In stoking the fraudulent claim that Trump was a clandestine agent of the Kremlin, Clinton’s campaign paid its law firm, Perkins Coie, to hire Fusion GPS and Christopher Steele to concoct the story; then it booked the payment as legal expenses rather than opposition research. As a result, the FEC fined the Clinton campaign,” McCarthy added.
The only reason Bragg gave Clinton a pass and filed charges containing a total penalty of 134 years in prison against Trump is simple.
“Clinton is a Democrat. Bragg sees his job not as enforcing the law evenhandedly but as getting Trump,” McCarthy stated.
American Patriot Daily will keep you up to date on any new developments in this ongoing story and the rest of the breaking news in politics, please bookmark our site, consider making us your homepage and forward our content with your friends on social media and email.
