Joe Biden’s master plan to weaponize the justice system to take out Donald Trump moved one step closer to success.
Biden’s Justice Department has a stacked deck in their favor and makes no bones about how Trump will face a kangaroo court.
And now a judge delivered Trump an ultimatum that is bad news.
Special counsel Jack Smith saw the first domino in the election interference plan fall into place when Obama campaign donor and appointee Judge Tanya Chutkan drew the assignment to preside over Trump’s trial on the sham charges of contesting the 2020 election.
Chutkan handed down stiffer sentences than the Biden administration asked for against Trump defenders in January 6 cases.
And Chutkan also made it clear she holds Trump personally responsible for what happened that day.
The first hearing in this case revolved around Smith trying to strip Trump of his First Amendment rights and muzzle Trump from speaking out about the evidence or anyone on the witness list in the case.
That presents a challenge to Trump because Mike Pence – one of Trump’s GOP rivals – is expected to be Smith’s star witness.
A gag order would allow Pence to smear Trump about January 6 but if Trump responds Smith can accuse Trump of bullying the witness and Chutkan can throw Trump in jail.
Trump could also end up in prison just for commenting on the case if Smith falsely claims Trump’s comment will taint the jury pool.
In the hearing the Obama judge made it clear she buys into Jack Smith’s arguments which will cripple Trump’s presidential campaign by limiting Trump’s First Amendment rights.
“I caution you and your client to take special care in your public statements about this case,” Chutkan raged during the hearing. “I will take whatever measures are necessary to safeguard the integrity of these proceedings.”
Chutkan also dismissed the idea that since Donald Trump’s expected political opponent brought the charges against him Trump should have more latitude to comment on the case.
“The fact that he’s running a political campaign has to yield to the orderly administration of justice,” Chutkan added. “If that means he can’t say exactly what he wants to say about witnesses in this case, that’s how it has to be.”
And finally, Chutkan warned Trump that if he made “inflammatory” statements about the case she was inclined to agree to Smith’s proposed January 2 trial date which would mean Trump would go to court – and be unable to campaign – ahead of the January 15 Iowa Caucuses.
“Even arguably ambiguous statements from parties or their counsel, if they can be reasonably interpreted to intimidate witnesses or to prejudice potential jurors, can threaten the process,” Chutkan ranted. “The more a party makes inflammatory statements about this case which could taint the jury pool … the greater the urgency will be that we proceed to trial quickly.”
Smith’s charges are clearly designed to influence the 2020 election.
Trump committed no crime and Smith could not find a statute on the books that made Trump’s conduct illegal.
Instead, Smith is counting on trying the case in D.C. where a Democrat judge and jury will be receptive to a novel legal theory that creates criminal activity where none previously existed.
And based on the Obama judge’s comments in court Smith’s plan to help Joe Biden in the 2024 election is well on the way to success.
American Patriot Daily will keep you up to date on any new developments in this ongoing story and the rest of the breaking news in politics, please bookmark our site, consider making us your homepage and forward our content with your friends on social media and email.
